Regulator’s claims of public deception emerge

SEC vs. Binance: In an unprecedented turn of events, accusations of public dishonesty and deception have surfaced against the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Binance and its associated companies took the drastic step of seeking court intervention on June 21.

The crypto industry giant is aiming to thwart the SEC’s propensity for making controversial statements that it says are seriously misleading and potentially damaging.

Binance asks court to compel SEC to comply with rules of conduct

The recent motion stems from the agreement between the SEC and Binance on a consent order outlining how Binance.US could use its funds. In what Binance considered a flagrant violation of this agreement, the SEC issued a press release that sparked widespread concern in the crypto exchange.

In the press release, the SEC claimed to have obtained “emergency assistance” to protect the assets of Binance.US customers. It paints an image of Binance and its CEO, Changpeng Zhao, as being in control of client assets. Hence, suggesting that they might misuse these assets.

“Given that Changpeng Zhao and Binance control platform client assets and have been able to mix client assets or misappropriate client assets as we have alleged, these prohibitions are essential to protect investors’ assets. “said Gurbir S. Grewal, director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.

Binance refuted the claims as they were contradicted by SEC statements in court that it had no evidence. The company claimed that the SEC’s depiction of the situation is not only disappointing but also misleading.

“At a minimum, the SEC statement violates the principle that the SEC cites so frequently – it omits material facts necessary to ensure that statements made are not false and misleading,” the filing reads.

Learn more: Why the SEC Wants to End Coinbase and Binance and Let Wall Street Take Control of Crypto

In the courtroom, the SEC representation struggled to corroborate their statements. Asked about the potential misappropriation of assets from BAM Trading Services and BAM Management US Holdings, the SEC was forced to admit that no such transgression had occurred.

TO RESEARCH: “Well, if you’re saying we have to shut down and impose this regime on corporate America because we’re concerned about the dissipation of corporate America’s assets, I want to know, where did you prove that the money is American companies leaving?

SECOND“It hasn’t happened yet, Your Honor.”

TO RESEARCH: “I want to know, are [BAM] relocated assets?… [A]Are you saying it’s happening or it’s not happening? And it’s kind of amazing to me that I’ve now asked this question to each of [the SEC attorneys] five times.”

SECOND“So currently the assets are not going offshore… [W]We don’t see any money flowing outside of the United States.

Additionally, Binance claims that the SEC’s claims that “emergency assistance has been obtained” are misleading. The company states that weeks of negotiation produced this relief and that the defendants consented to it. There is, they point out, no evidence to suggest that the assets of BAM’s clients are at risk.

The crux of the matter lies in the alleged misinformation propagated by the SEC press release. The BAM companies argue that these statements can have a significant impact on the case. Therefore, ask the court to issue an order requiring the SEC to follow established rules of conduct.

SEC vs. Binance: The Beginning of a Long Journey

The SEC vs. Binance case underscores the inherent volatility and dynamism of the cryptocurrency industry. With one of the biggest crypto platforms under scrutiny, the outcome of the case could set a precedent for future interactions between regulators and crypto companies.

Thus, all parties involved should not underestimate the need for truthful, clear and transparent communication.

Faced with serious allegations of misconduct and dishonesty, the SEC now finds itself in the spotlight. It remains unclear whether liability for his statements will lie with the SEC. Yet the integrity of regulators is as essential as the institutions they oversee.

As the saga between Binance and the SEC continues, the broader implications for the crypto market will no doubt be profound.


In accordance with the guidelines of the Trust Project, BeInCrypto is committed to providing impartial and transparent reports. This news article aims to provide accurate and timely information. However, readers are urged to independently fact-check and seek professional advice before making any decisions based on this content.

Leave a Comment